IN WATCHING the flow of events over the past decade or so, it is hard to avoid the feeling that something very fundamental has happened in world history. březen Před patnácti lety jsem ve své knize Konec dějin a poslední člověk prohlásil, že chce-li být společnost moderní, neexistuje alternativa k tržnímu. Francis Fukuyama a Samuel Huntington (Konec dějin nebo střet civilizací?) že se nacházíme na konci dějin v důsledku vítězství liberální demokracie jako.
|Published (Last):||27 July 2006|
|PDF File Size:||19.39 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.94 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The history at the end of history.
Please select an option. In the political sphere, the proposed changes to the Soviet constitution, legal system, and party rules amount to much less than the establishment of a liberal state. I am not using the term “fascism” here in its most precise kohec, fully aware of the frequent misuse of this term to denounce anyone to the right of the user.
This does not by any means imply the end of international conflict per se. Works by Francis Fukuyama. The Chinese leadership has in fact been much more circumspect in criticizing Mao and Maoism than Gorbachev with respect ionec Brezhnev and Stalin, and the regime continues to pay lip service to Marxism-Leninism as its ideological underpinning.
Dějiny na konci dějin
Economic Statistics do not begin to describe the dynamism, initiative, and openness evident in China since the reform began. But the former is explained by commercial motives and the latter is a vestige of earlier ideologically-based rivalries. Indeed, for Hegel the very dichotomy between the ideal and material worlds was itself only an fukuyamq one that was ultimately overcome by the self-conscious subject; in his system, the material world is itself only an aspect of mind.
In his Washington Post opinion piece, Fukuyama also addressed this point.
And yet this realm of consciousness in the long run necessarily becomes manifest in the material world, indeed creates the material world in its own image.
Registration is free and requires only your email address. Indeed, one of the world’s most dangerous nation-states today is Iran, run by extremist Shiite mullahs.
Konec dějin a poslední člověk : Francis Fukuyama :
Important as these changes in China have been, however, it fejin developments in the Soviet Union – the original “homeland of the world proletariat” – that have put the final nail in the coffin of the Marxist-Leninist alternative to liberal democracy. The Soviet reform, for example, was motivated in good measure by Moscow’s sense of insecurity in the technological-military realm.
For there is a very widespread belief among many observers of international relations that underneath the skin of ideology is a hard core of great power national interest that guarantees a fairly high level of competition and conflict between nations. I deal with an exploratation of two concepcions of the American politologists Francis Fukuyama and Samuel Huntington in my work.
Modus vivendi: Francis Fukuyama: Konec dějin a poslední člověk
Show More Contact Us. He argued that Islam is not an imperialist force like Stalinism and fascism; that is, it has little intellectual or emotional appeal outside the Islamic “heartlands”. Email required Receive deiin Sunday newsletter. Hegel was the first philosopher to speak the language of modern social science, insofar as man for him was the product konef his concrete historical and social environment and not, as earlier natural right theorists would have it, a collection of more or less fixed “natural” attributes.
Fukuyama has also stated that his thesis was incomplete, but for a different reason: There is no struggle or conflict over “large” issues, and consequently no need for generals or statesmen; what remains is primarily economic activity.
The choice it makes will be highly important for us, given the Soviet Union’s size and military strength, for that power will continue to preoccupy us and slow our realization that we have already emerged on the other side of history.
But surely, the class issue has actually been successfully resolved kondc the West. The notion that mankind has progressed through a series of primitive stages of consciousness on his path to the present, and that these stages corresponded to concrete forms of social organization, such as tribal, slave-owning, theocratic, and finally democratic-egalitarian fukuyzma, has become inseparable from the modern understanding of man.
The Wall Street Journal school of deterministic materialism habitually points to the stunning economic success of Asia in the past few decades as evidence of the viability of free market economics, with the implication that all societies would see similar development were they simply to allow their populations to pursue their material self-interest freely.
Why was it that these countries moved away from central planning only in the s’ The answer must be found in the consciousness of the elites and leaders ruling them, who decided to opt for the “Protestant” life of wealth and risk over the “Catholic” path of poverty and security.
The thesis was defended successfully. Gorbachev’s claim that he is seeking to return to the true Lenin is perfectly easy to understand: Due to the strength and adaptability of the indigenous cultures there, Asia became a battleground for a variety of imported Western ideologies early in this century. But the doctrine has little appeal for non-Muslims, and it is hard to believe that the movement will take on any universal significance.